The Perverse Appeal of LOST

This post contains no spoilers.

The Queen and I are halfway through season three of LOST and goddamn I love this show.

It’s hard for me to admit because LOST is popular, and it’s crucial to my self-image that I only enjoy television shows that hobble along for a season or three, unappreciated by the unwashed masses, before getting unceremoniously axed. Freaks & Geeks, Arrested Development, Firefly, and so forth. (We are going to conveniently ignore that I also liked The Sopranos, and that I laugh until my stomach hurts every time I stumble across AFHV …) And yet here I am, a LOST junkie, just like half of America.

Intellectually I recognize that the third season has all of the same problems of the first two: it shows us the trees, so to speak, and willfully ignores the forest. In other words, the creators of LOST have inverted the traditional mystery formula by making the clues themselves the focus of the show, instead of using them as an means to a end (the end being the solution of the central mystery).

Here’s a hypothetical example (hypothetical in the sense that I just made all this up; again, no spoilers in this post.) An episode ends with someone on LOST finding a leather-bound tome entitled “Secrets of the Island.” Yes! Finally we’ll learn what’s going on! But in the next installment, that person opens the book to discover that the whole thing is written in ancient indecipherable pictograms. Dammit! But in the last five minutes, someone notices that the final third of the book is blank, and the ink of the last entry is fresh! “It’s a work-in-progress,” says Major Character. “Someone is still writing it!!” And in the last five minutes of the next episode it is revealed via flashback that Other Major Character studied Ancient Indecipherable Pictology in college–holy shit!!!! And this goes on for three more episodes, at which point Major Character confronts Other Major Character with the book, and he (O.M.C.) confesses that he is using the book to record the movements of the other castaways, but only because a giant, ambulatory, sentient coconut threatened to kill him if he didn’t. And you, the viewer, are, like, “well, I’m glad the mystery of the book is cleared up BUT WHAT’S THIS ABOUT A GIANT AMBULATORY SENTIENT COCONUT??!!!” Lots and lots of clues (and episodes about clues), but you’re not one jot closer to understanding the central mystery. And meanwhile the LOST prop department is hastily burying the book in a Superfund site, hoping that no one remembers the title.

I found all this exasperating during season two (during which I parodied the style with The Adventure of the Missing Stocking.) But I’ve succumbed to Stockholm Syndrome or something, because now I kind of enjoy the sheer absurdity of it.

The structure of the narrative reminds me, in many ways, of a computer roleplaying game (CRPG). A quick primer for my seven non-nerd readers: in a CRPG (such as World of Warcraft, a.k.a. WoW), you typically start out as a puny little nothing, a 47-pound weakling armed with a broomstick. As such, you only have the wherewithal to fight monsters of a comparable degree of fragility (rats, typically). But every time you dispatch one, you gain “experience,” and once you’ve acquired enough experience, you “level”. Leveling (as it is called) means that your abilities go up, you are able to buy and use better weapons, and can now go toe-to-toe with slightly more menacing creatures–giant ambulatory sentient coconuts, say. Kill enough of those, level again, and move on to the next class of baddies.

I love CRPGs (so much so that I’ve avoided WoW like the plague–if I wanted a all-consuming addiction I’d pick up some heroin from a Seattle street corner, thanks). I love them despite my frequent realizations, while playing, that in-game progress is largely chimeric. When you’re a level 1 squire it may take you two minutes to kill a rat; when you are a level 9 knight you can kill a rat with a single stroke–but you don’t fight rats, you fight ogres, and the time it takes you to kill them is … two minutes. You environment levels up as you do, such that you are pretty much playing the same game all the time, albeit with cool new equipment and a more impressive sounding rank. The excitement you feel upon leveling fades almost immediately, as you start accumulating experience to reach the next stage.

This is the LOST formula in a nutshell. During each show you gain a little experience in the form of new information: about the island, the characters, or both; every four episodes or so you level up, as some (allegedly) major piece of the overall puzzle falls into place. After leveling up in a CRPG, you typically head to Ye Olde Flail ‘N’ Scented Candle Emporium, sell all your current equipment, and buy the improved weapons that your enhanced abilities now allow you to wield; likewise, after a revelatory LOST episode, fans chuck all their old theories into the dustbin and cook up new ones consistent with the revised facts. Then, having done so, each–the player of a CRPG, or the viewer of LOST–is handed a brand new quest, or puzzle, or plot plot. The ephemeral thrill of leveling vanishes, replaced by a longing to hit the next milestone. You never disembark from the treadmill, it just goes faster.

This may sound like criticism, but it’s not. It’s admiration. Like the creators of World of Warcraft, the writers of LOST have managed to throw a saddle on the addictive lure of leveling and ride it to success. And bully for them. Like I said, I love this genre, even if I can visualize the levers they are pulling.

LOST is not the first program to attempt this, to be sure. Lynch tried it with Twin Peaks, but the wheels flew off the cart in the second season (and even before that, the ride was pretty bumpy). The X-Files came close to pulling it off, but it wasn’t certain if the writers would ever provide resolution to the core “mythos” mysteries, and after a while fans (such as myself) gave up on the series. That’s what CRPGers call an “endgame problem”–the game might be fun to play, but the whole enterprise feels pointless unless there’s a clearly-defined “ending” on the horizon. (Even WoW, which you could conceivably play forever, has a maximum level that a character can reach, giving players a concrete goal toward which to strive.) The creators of LOST obviated the “endgame problem” by announcing that the series will end in 2010, and swearing that answers will be supplied. (For details, see this commendably spoiler-free USA Today article from last year.)

Another piece of lingo that crops up a lot in CRPG circles is “grinding“: when your character has to do the same thing over and over again (killing rats, for instance) to acquire the experience necessary to level. If the CRPG isn’t intrinsically interesting, then grinding is just that: a grind. But if the world is well-constructed, and the game is well-written, grinding is tolerated (and even enjoyed) by players as a necessary evil, something to keep you immersed in the storyline as long as possible. After all, a game in which you started at level 70 and killed the End Boss in your first fight would be lame beyond belief.

Much of LOST is grinding, honestly: stuff to keep the viewer occupied until the next bombshell drops and the story is taken the next level (so to speak). But here, halfway through season three, it’s becoming increasingly obvious (at least to me) that the grinding itself is pretty fun. That’s high-praise right there: these guys can even stall entertainingly.

Yes some of the episodes are clunkers, and lot of the plot twists don’t endure a moment’s scrutiny, and I STILL REMEMBER THE TITLE OF THE BOOK YOU GODDAMNED CHEATS!! But the game’s been a lot of fun so far, and I’ll gladly play through to the end.

69 thoughts on “The Perverse Appeal of LOST

  1. I firmly believe that LOST is actually a game and give detailed explanations of how it all works on my website.

    My website http://www.LOSTisaGame.com has been in existence for over two years. The theory behind it all began as a thread I maintained on one of the ABC forums beginning in October 2005.

    In addition, based on my theory, I have consistently been able to predict the exact days when certain events will occur.

    I have also been able to predict the deaths of certain characters, months before they occured.

    My site is frequented by fans from over 110 countries around the world. I suggest you join the tens of thousands of fans who visit the site each day. http://www.LOSTisaGame.com

    all_games

  2. Lostisagame.com has been around since nearly the beginning of the show and has had a strong following re: the Lost is a Game theory…FYI. Many of these bits of info have appeared there for years; very in-depth site.

  3. THE GAME THEORY has been around for about three years and the Website (LOSTisaGame.Com) that heavily supports the theory has been around for over two years.

    Lets not take credit where credit isn’t do.

  4. If you want to highlight the GAME THEORY of Lost, then congratulate the effort, time and intelligence of the authors of LOSTisaGame.Com.
    The credit is right there, others are just bad copies (with a delay of three years!)
    Period

  5. “Your argument that LOST is a game is (wrong | flawed | old news)” = “HAI GUYZ I DID NOT READ THE POST ON WHICH I AM COMMENTING!!!”

  6. It’s called an MMORPG (massively multiplayer online role playing game), not a CRPG. You can even shorten it to MMO.

  7. you, sir, have inspired me to make a t-shirt!

    Giant Ambulatory Sentient Coconut

    choosing an appropriate graphic seems difficult, although i suppose we could just stick in the Flying Spagetti Monster and just freak people the hell out.

    [i think you’ve got the google results pinned with that phrase, btw]

  8. I started out watching it. Got bored fairly quickly. Polar bears and black clouds and random weird things that didn’t point to anything and no one ever referenced again.

    But I’ve started watching once more. And now I slap my knee and say, “that was HAWESOME!” after just about every amazing plot twist/development/clue. I’m not really sure how or if it has changed (it’s not you, it’s me, maybe?!) but I’m really having a good time.

    And I am also suitably embarrassed by my enjoyment of it.

  9. I’d agree lost is entertaining, it’s pretty much an addiction that most of its watchers have. But I disagree about the grind, LOST’s grind is getting really bad. It’s become so predictable, and basically it relates to them walking to x location to stop ben/locke/others/hostiles from doing x – and then going back to where they started, then finding out that ben/locke/others/hostiles are at it again, and travelling back to x to rescue whoever.

    In the meanwhile, Sawyer Jack and Kate engage in a triangle romance,and Sayid’s amazing ability to fix just about anything comes in use – also Sayid warns Jack about what’s about to happen.

    Hurley goes on an adventure, and tries to chat everyone up, while Sun and Jin continue to have outlandish marital problems. Mike continues along yelling “Waallter”, and Desmond cries out for Penelope.

    Have I forgotten anyone?

  10. (ignoring the several tedious persons who were, apparently, terribly excited to find what they seem to imagine is yet another Lost fansite, suitable for endless wrangling)

    Mr. Baldwin;
    Your description of Lost suggests nothing so much to me as a re-invention (perhaps unintentional) of pulp fiction. Ongoing mystery/mysteries, clues that spawn more questions, surprise backstory, unnatural occurences (see also polar bear), heavy atmosphere, exotic location and a structure adapted to supporting an ongoing short-format series in a disposable medium . . . whether they meant to or not, the writers of Lost have recreated a classic writing style. Of course, pulp fiction is also famously uneven, producing both utter drek and surprise masterpieces like Chandler/Marlowe. That seems to fit, too.

  11. My apologies for the multiple commenting. For whatever reason, there was no indication that ANY of the posts were succesful.

    I therefore conclude that a malevolent Force–perhaps, indeed, one of these wicked Cocoa-Nuts of which we hear so much–has infested my computer.

  12. I’d love to hear what you think of LOST after you finish watching the final episode of season 3…

  13. all those lost fans will be even more dissapointed when they find out LOST is a new ride at a WALT disney them park and the series is just a marketing tool!

  14. Yo, people, he’s not saying that the major plot twist of Lost is that it is a game, he’s saying that it is STRUCTURED like a game. Reading comprehension is a dying art.

    I watched the first few episodes of Season 1 and realized that Lost could become an obsession for me, but unlike Myst, to which I (successfully) dedicated Christmas break of my first year of grad school, I didn’t have control over the time investment and stepped away. Like you, I think drug addiction would be easier on my family than getting involved in a more endless game, or an ongoing TV series.

  15. That’s silly. Lost isn’t an endless tv show. If you think it’s an endless grind of brain candy and flashy faux mysteries, then it’s entirely your fault.
    I don’t go around saying such things about stories that I don’t understand.

  16. this is exactly why i have refused to watch the show. it feels like dropping quarters in a slot machine. i know i will be addicted and do not want my life to revolve around it.

  17. I just finished season 3 and enjoyed it a lot. Much more than season 2. I like the show a lot and agree with your central premise about it being a show about the clues more than the mystery. I will disagree with your statement that each show causes viewers to ditch their old theories and come up with new ones based on what they learned. I’ve had the same theory since about midway through season 1. They’re dead. They’re in purgatory. Once someone has been purified of their sins they “die” and move on.

    Really at this point the show has reinforced this so much that if they end up resolving it some other way, it will come across as a last minute rewrite in order to have a neat “twist” ending.

  18. The problem with Lost is we never figure anything out. For example, I don’t know why this episode we just watched that they just don’t pin up the foreigners and ask what their mission is on the island hostly.

Comments are closed.