{"id":2811,"date":"2004-10-07T16:06:30","date_gmt":"2004-10-07T23:06:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/defectiveyeti.com\/?p=2811"},"modified":"2004-10-07T16:06:30","modified_gmt":"2004-10-07T23:06:30","slug":"some-thoughts-about-the-debate-ii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/defectiveyeti.com\/wordpress\/2004\/10\/07\/some-thoughts-about-the-debate-ii\/","title":{"rendered":"Some Thoughts About The Debate II"},"content":{"rendered":"<table  class=\" table table-hover\" align='right' width=242'>\n<tr>\n<td align='center'><img src='\/images\/darthcheney.jpg'><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td align='center'><span class='footnote'>&#8220;Join me, and together we will rule the republic as father and son.&#8221;<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p>Two disclaimers.  One:  Despite two longish political posts in week, I assure you this isn&#8217;t becoming a political blog.  Well, maybe a little bit. But only for the next <strike>60<\/strike> 30 days (my how time flies). After the election, regardless of who wins, I promise to go back to not caring, Honest Native American.  Two:  I realize I&#8217;m a little late to the vp-debate analysis party, but I didn&#8217;t get back from DC until late last night and only now have had the opportunity to weigh in.<\/p>\n<p>Overall I thought things were kind of boring, but I did like the ending, when Cheney cut off Edward&#8217;s hand and then revealed himself to be his father.<\/p>\n<p>Heh.  Okay, just kidding.  Here&#8217;s my real thoughts:<\/p>\n<li>I&#8217;d call it a tie.  I know that &#8220;tie&#8221; is what people say about debates when they think their side lost, but, seriously, I thought the whole thing was a wash.  The only time I ever predicted a winner during the course of the event was about halfway through, when I announced that Edwards was &#8220;cleaning up.&#8221;  But somehow, by the end, I decided that it was just sound and fury, signifying nothing.  It was like matter and anti-matter:  Mr. Positive and Mr. Negative collided in a flash that left nothing in its wake except a mysterious, 100-minute void in time.<\/li>\n<li>Early in the proceedings, Edwards repeated, verbatim, a few lines Kerry had used in the first debate.  I dunno if that was planned as an effort to drive home a few key points or if Edwards was nervous and could only cough out some recycled one-liners, but it was a poor opening gambit either way.  Wasn&#8217;t one of the major criticism of Bush&#8217;s performance that he kept repeating the same thing over and over?<\/li>\n<li>After the debate the commentators on MSNBC were remarking how surprising Cheney&#8217;s performance was, because he didn&#8217;t come across as a &#8220;go fuck yourself&#8221; barking ogre and instead seemed staid and respectable.  Do these people have no short-term memory whatsoever?  That&#8217;s exactly how Cheney presented himself in the 2000 vice-presidential debate, to the point where many people (myself included) found themselves thinking that a Bush presidency wouldn&#8217;t be <em>that<\/em> bad, what with such a reasonable, cautious second-in-command.  Since then Cheney has unmasked himself as the nephew of Satan, sure, but why people thought he was going to present himself as anything except dignified is beyond me.<\/li>\n<li>Edwards:  &#8220;I think the vice president and his wife love their daughter. I think they love her very much. And you can&#8217;t have anything but respect for the fact that they&#8217;re willing to talk about the fact that they have a gay daughter, the fact that they embrace her. It&#8217;s a wonderful thing.&#8221;  That  might be the most wince-worthy thing I&#8217;ve ever heard in a debate.  I don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s worse, Edward&#8217;s implication that Cheney might <em>not<\/em> love his daughter, or that it takes such a Herculean effort to love gay offspring that parents who do deserve respect.<\/li>\n<li>You got to admire the way that Cheney can repeat known falsehoods (&#8220;I&#8217;ve never suggested there&#8217;s a connection between Saddam and 9\/11&#8221;) without a trace of visible shame.  No, seriously:  you&#8217;ve <em>got<\/em> to admire it, by law.  It&#8217;s written into the Patriot Act.<\/li>\n<li>What&#8217;s the point of having a &#8220;backup buzzer system&#8221; if you&#8217;re not going to use it whenever Edwards breaks the &#8220;no mentioning your running mate&#8217;s name&#8221; rule?<\/li>\n<li>Edwards says that America is taking &#8220;90 percent of the coalition casualties.&#8221;  Cheney replied, &#8220;Classic example. He won&#8217;t count the sacrifice and the contribution of Iraqi allies&#8221; and that, by saying &#8220;they shouldn&#8217;t count, because you want to be able to say that the Americans are taking 90 percent of the sacrifice,&#8221; Edwards is demeaning them.  In response, Edwards blusters &#8220;I&#8217;m not demeaning!&#8221;  Great comeback, there, tiger.  And this guy was a trial lawyer?  How about pointing out that you were talking about the coalition and Cheney isn&#8217;t, so it&#8217;s apples and oranges.  How about saying &#8220;This administration is so desperate to disguise the true cost of the operation that they want to count the Iraqis as part of the coalition <em>to invade Iraq<\/em>.  Now <em>there&#8217;s<\/em> your classic example.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>Laugh out Loud moment:  Cheney talking about his disappointment over how divided America is, as if it was just some unlucky break.  Yeah, I&#8217;ll be sure to use that same tact in my next performance review with my boss:  &#8220;One of my great disappointments with my job is how much time I spend surfing the Internet instead of doing actual work.&#8221;<\/li>\n<p>Vice-presidental debate transcripts here:  <a href='http:\/\/www.omaha.com\/toolbox\/story_printer.php?u_id=1222597'>part 1<\/a>, <a href='http:\/\/www.omaha.com\/toolbox\/story_printer.php?u_id=1222660'>part 2<\/a>.  Comments are open.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2811","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/defectiveyeti.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2811","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/defectiveyeti.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/defectiveyeti.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/defectiveyeti.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/defectiveyeti.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2811"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/defectiveyeti.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2811\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/defectiveyeti.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2811"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/defectiveyeti.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2811"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/defectiveyeti.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2811"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}